<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>delgrosso dot com &#187; First Draft Theatre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delgrosso.com/category/first-draft-theatre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delgrosso.com</link>
	<description>Personal site of Tony Delgrosso, NY-based freelance writer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First Draft Theatre</title>
		<link>http://www.delgrosso.com/2008/07/first-draft-theatre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.delgrosso.com/2008/07/first-draft-theatre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Draft Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delgrosso.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For better or worse, and based on my post from earlier today, I&#8217;ve launched 1st Draft Theatre.  Go have a look.  Better yet, submit something.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For better or worse, and based on my post from earlier today, I&#8217;ve launched <a href="/firstdraft/">1st Draft Theatre</a>.  Go have a look.  Better yet, submit something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.delgrosso.com/2008/07/first-draft-theatre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mining drafts</title>
		<link>http://www.delgrosso.com/2008/07/mining-drafts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.delgrosso.com/2008/07/mining-drafts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Draft Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first draft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delgrosso.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was sifting through the office closet again this morning, and I found an abandoned first draft of a manuscript1.  And it&#8217;s fucking awful.  Oh dear Zeus it pained me to just skim through it.  Truly a dreadful, dreadful embarassment. It&#8217;s an old piece, and was probably my first real stab at serious novel-length prose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was sifting through the office closet again this morning, and I found an abandoned first draft of a manuscript<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-145-1' id='fnref-145-1'>1</a></sup>.  And it&#8217;s fucking awful.  Oh dear Zeus it pained me to just skim through it.  Truly a dreadful, dreadful embarassment.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an old piece, and was probably my first real stab at serious novel-length prose after having written mostly short comedic fiction and spec scripts up to that point.  But it&#8217;s dreadful in a <em>good</em> way.  Which is to say, it&#8217;s a lot of fun to see all the mistakes and awkwardness of a first draft, especially one in which I was just &#8220;getting my legs&#8221; in a new format.</p>
<p>We like to dismiss them, but as bad as they always are (and must be), first drafts are awesome.  They&#8217;re hastily written and chock full of mismatched tenses and missing punctuation and godawful syntax, but they have the fire and mojo of a fresh concept trying to get out.  They still contain bits of genius and unexplored characters and honest if clumsy dialogue.  Even when we abandon them, we shouldn&#8217;t ever get rid of them for good.  They&#8217;re learning tools, mines for reusable raw materials, and object lessons in the craft.</p>
<p>Whenever writing something, I try to follow Heinlein&#8217;s edict of &#8220;you must refrain from rewriting, except to editorial order,&#8221; and get everything down on paper/screen that I can before so much as auto-correcting a single typo.  If I don&#8217;t get it all out of my brain first, I&#8217;ll start nitpicking and changing and trying to make things letter-perfect before the story is even told, which results in a boring, suck-ass story with good structure and grammar.  I&#8217;d rather have it the other way around to begin with.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s with that in mind that I&#8217;m re-reading the old shitty manuscript, and finding that for as rotten as it is, it was a great story that never saw the light of day.  It has a character that I really, really like.  There are a couple of sub-plots in it that I enjoyed, and want to graft onto another story.  And I&#8217;m thinking of posting it to the blog in a new section, as well as a ton of other first drafts and bits of incomplete stories.  Why shouldn&#8217;t my first draft mine be open to anyone else with a pickaxe?  Personally I like seeing other people&#8217;s rough work, and maybe going through my dreck will be interesting and/or helpful to someone.</p>
<p>Thoughts?
<div class='footnotes'>
<div class='footnotedivider'></div>
<ol>
<li id='fn-145-1'>Which is nothing unusual, really &#8211; my office is littered with them. Isn&#8217;t yours? <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-145-1'>&#8617;</a></span></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.delgrosso.com/2008/07/mining-drafts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

